Editorial
Editorial Standards
How Squffy writes, sources, and reviews. Three named writers, peer-reviewed in-house, with primary sources cited inline (BVA, RCVS, DEFRA, EN/ISO standards). Every article carries a named author, a named peer reviewer, and a dated last-reviewed stamp. Every correction is logged and visible. This page exists so you can audit our work the way we audit it ourselves.
How we write
Our principles
Research-first
Every wiki article and long-form piece begins with a written research brief: the question, the intended reader, and the sources we plan to draw on. Drafting only starts after that brief is approved. We work from primary sources first. Veterinary literature (PubMed, the Veterinary Record, JAVMA, BSAVA Companion). British Veterinary Association and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons position statements. UK DEFRA guidance and the relevant statutes (Animals Act 1971, Microchipping of Dogs Regulations 2015). EU REACH chemical and textile rules. ISO and EN standards for webbing, plating, and hardware. The Kennel Club and breed-specific health committees for breed-fit claims. And, where the claim is about Squffy product, our own lab-tested specs (Tactical buckle break-rated to 360 kg, frog clasp release-rated to 907 kg) with the test report on file. We do not source from open forums, vendor blogs, AI-generated content farms, or affiliate sites. When a claim depends on a single source, we say so. When sources disagree, we name the disagreement and pick the one with stronger methodology.
Named authors
No anonymous bylines. Every wiki and blog article carries the name and remit of a real contributor. Our writers: Anna de Jong, Practical Living-with-Dogs Writer based in Amsterdam, our voice on collar fit, naming and daily life with dogs. Sophie Visser, Adventure & Travel Writer based in Utrecht, covering long walks, working-line breeds and outdoor weather. Laura de Wit, Dog Behavior & Welfare Writer based in Eindhoven, our reference on training fundamentals and breed welfare. Each writer has a public profile at squffy.com/writers with photo, recent articles, and a contact route for corrections.
Editorial review
We are a small Dutch studio with three writers (Anna, Sophie, Laura, each with their own published remit on the Writers page). We are honest about the limits of that: we do not have a veterinary or training panel on retainer. Pretending we did would be a fabrication. What we do instead: every article is peer-reviewed before publication by one of our other writers. A collar-fit claim drafted by Anna gets read by Laura; a behavior claim drafted by Laura gets read by Sophie. The reviewer's name appears on the article alongside the author's. The reviewer's job is to challenge the claim against the cited sources and to flag anything that sounds confident beyond what the sources actually support. For claims that sit at the edge of our in-house experience, clinical health, novel legal interpretations, materials engineering at the lab level, we cite a primary source (BVA, RCVS, DEFRA, EU REACH, the Animals Act 1971, manufacturer datasheets, EN/ISO standards) and label the claim as informational rather than as professional advice. If a question genuinely needs a vet, we say so and direct the reader to one.
Citation discipline
Citations are linked, dated, and tiered. We rank sources by how trustworthy they are for the claim being made: • Tier 1, peer-reviewed studies and government-issued guidance. The Veterinary Record, JAVMA, PubMed, UK DEFRA, EU REACH, BVA position statements. Cited freely as primary evidence. • Tier 2, recognized professional bodies. The Kennel Club, BSAVA, RVC, FECAVA, FCI breed standards, the Association of Pet Dog Trainers UK, IGP federations. Cited with named attribution. • Tier 3, textbooks, established trade publications, manufacturer data sheets. Used for technical claims (hardware specs, textile standards) with the caveat that the publisher has commercial interests. • Tier 4, forums, vendor blogs, social posts, affiliate content. Not cited as evidence of fact. Occasionally cited for cultural context (e.g., what XL Bully owners call a particular collar style) with explicit framing. When a finding hasn't been replicated, when a study has a small sample size, or when there's a known methodological criticism, we say so. Every external source links back to the original publisher, not a screenshot, not a paywall workaround.
AI-assisted, human-owned
AI accelerates research and first-draft writing on technical topics. The model we use (Anthropic Claude) is given a vetted research brief, primary sources we have already read, and the Squffy brand-voice document. Output is treated as a first pass. Every draft is then read line-by-line by the named human author, who: (1) checks every claim against the underlying source; (2) removes any AI hallucination; (3) rewrites for brand voice; (4) adds first-hand experience that the model cannot have (a Vizsla's neck shape, the smell of nylon under a hot iron, the sound of a frog clasp under load); and (5) signs the byline. No article is published as AI-only output. Every article that used AI assistance is labeled "AI-assisted, human-owned", visibly, on the article itself, not buried in a footer. Our full AI-use policy is at squffy.com/editorial/ai-use.
Independence
Squffy is a retailer. We make money when you buy a collar, a leash, or a pin. That commercial interest is real and we don't hide it: every article that mentions a Squffy product carries a small "Made by Squffy" tag at first mention. Editorial does not change conclusions to favor a Squffy product over a competitor. If a competitor's harness is the right answer for an XL Bully puppy, we say so. If the right answer is no harness at all, we say that too. We do not run paid placements, sponsored content, or affiliate links. We do not hide bad news. If a Squffy product needs a safety advisory or recall, it appears with the same prominence as a how-to article, top of the page, persistent banner, push to subscribers.
Our source hierarchy
For animal care, we prioritize peer-reviewed research and veterinary guidance, with LICG for practical Dutch care advice. For Dutch animal-welfare rules, we consult the Wet dieren and NVWA. For EU chemical-safety requirements, we consult REACH and ECHA. Manufacturer specifications describe our own products; they are not independent evidence of health or training benefits.
AI use policy
AI assists with drafting; people remain responsible for the published article. Article disclosures explain who reviewed the draft and who provides editorial oversight. Consult the writer, reviewer and editor names and any review date shown with the article; AI assistance does not replace human review or editorial responsibility.
Governance & review cadence
YMYL review
Health, legality and safety claims are reviewed by the Squffy editorial team before publication. Nothing goes live without sign-off when claims could affect wellbeing or compliance.
Update cadence
Every wiki article carries a 'Last reviewed' date. Articles are re-checked at least every 12 months, or immediately when regulation, science or product availability changes materially.
How a Squffy article gets made
The full editorial workflow, eight steps, every one logged in our internal tracker:
- Brief. Editorial writes a one-page research brief: the question, the intended reader, the expected sources, and the YMYL category (if any). Drafting does not start until the brief is approved by an editor.
- Source review. The author pulls 5 to 15 primary sources before drafting a single paragraph. Forums, vendor blogs and affiliate content are out.
- First draft. The author drafts by hand or with AI assistance. Either way, output is treated as a first pass, a structure to react to, never a finished article.
- Author edit. The named human author reads line by line, checks every claim against the source, removes hallucinated facts, rewrites for brand voice, and adds first-hand experience.
- Peer review (YMYL only). A second Squffy writer reads the draft and challenges every claim against the cited sources. The peer reviewer's name is added to the article on publication.
- Editor sign-off. A Squffy editor reads for clarity, internal consistency and anti-hype. The editor can request a rewrite, decline the article, or send it back for re-research.
- Publish. The article goes live with the author's photo, the reviewer's name, the publication date, the last-reviewed date and a link to this corrections policy.
- Re-review. Every article is re-checked at least every 12 months, sooner when regulation, science or product availability changes materially. The "Last reviewed" date you see on an article is the date a human re-read it, not the date it was first written.
Source hierarchy
How we rank the trustworthiness of evidence. Every claim in a Squffy article is tied to a tier; the higher the YMYL stakes, the higher the tier required.
- Tier 1: Primary research and government guidance. Peer-reviewed studies (PubMed, the Veterinary Record, JAVMA, BSAVA Companion). UK DEFRA, EU REACH, BVA, RCVS position statements. Cited freely as evidence of fact.
- Tier 2: Professional bodies and federations. The Kennel Club, BSAVA, RVC, FECAVA, FCI breed standards, the Association of Pet Dog Trainers UK, IGP/Schutzhund federations. Cited with named attribution; treated as expert opinion, not primary research.
- Tier 3: Textbooks, established trade publications, manufacturer data sheets. Used for technical claims (hardware specs, textile standards). The publisher's commercial interests are disclosed in-line.
- Tier 4: Forums, vendor blogs, social posts, affiliate content. Not cited as evidence of fact. Occasionally cited for cultural context (e.g., what XL Bully owners call a particular collar style) with explicit framing.
Corrections policy
We get things wrong. Our policy is to fix them visibly, not silently.
- How to flag a correction. Email editorial@squffy.com with the article URL and the disputed claim. Include a source if you have one. We aim to respond within five working days.
- What happens. Editorial cross-checks the disputed claim against the original sources cited. If the claim is wrong, we update the article and add a dated correction note at the top describing what changed.
- Severity tiers. Typo, silent fix. Factual error, dated correction note at the top of the article. Safety-relevant error, dated note plus outbound notification to subscribers who opened the article. Regulatory or recall-grade error, dated note, outbound notification, and a persistent banner on the article for 30 days.
- Public log. A dated list of every material correction we have ever issued, with links to the affected articles, lives at squffy.com/editorial/corrections.
YMYL topic taxonomy
The categories that get extra review because they can affect a dog's wellbeing, an owner's compliance with law, or a household's finances. Every article in these categories names its peer reviewer (a second Squffy writer) on publication, cites its primary source, and is labeled informational rather than as professional advice.
- Health and safety. Hardware breaking force, plating toxicity, choking hazards, breed-specific risks, the harness-vs-collar question. Sourced from BVA / RCVS guidance and manufacturer datasheets; cross-reviewed by a second Squffy writer; flagged as informational, not veterinary advice.
- Behavior and training. Leash handling, control-handle technique, breed-specific behavior, prong / choke collar context. Cited from APDT-UK published guidance and Kennel Club material; cross-reviewed by Sophie Visser (Adventure & Travel Writer, working-line breed remit) or by a second Squffy writer where Sophie is the author.
- Materials and durability. Webbing strength, embroidery durability, plating wear, fail-mode analysis. Cited from EN / ISO standards and supplier datasheets; cross-reviewed by a second Squffy writer.
- Legal compliance. UK Animals Act 1971, microchipping law, dog tag identification requirements, EU REACH textile rules, breed-specific legislation. Reviewed against the original statutory text by editorial; we direct readers to the relevant statute and recommend a solicitor for situation-specific advice rather than provide our own legal opinion.
- Financial. Returns, warranty terms, refund timelines, dispute escalation. Pulled from our Terms of Service and cross-referenced with the article author.
Conflicts of interest
Squffy is a privately-owned Dutch retailer. Our founders are Jenna and Dana. We have no outside investors, parent companies, or retail partnerships that could shape editorial. Our three writers (Anna, Sophie, Laura) are paid contributors on a flat per-piece basis; payment is never contingent on the conclusion an article reaches or on the products it mentions. We do not have an external reviewer panel on retainer, peer review happens between our own writers. We do not run affiliate links, sponsored content, or paid product placements. If a Squffy product is mentioned in an article, it is tagged "Made by Squffy" at first mention.
What we don't do
- We don't publish AI-only content. Every article has a named human author who reads, edits, and signs the byline.
- We don't run affiliate links or paid placements. Product links go to our own catalog or to a primary source.
- We don't hide our commercial interests. Squffy products in articles are tagged "Made by Squffy".
- We don't hide negative news. Recalls, advisories, and material corrections appear with the same prominence as how-to content.
- We don't cite forums, vendor blogs, or affiliate content as evidence of fact.
- We don't republish articles without re-reviewing them. Every "Last reviewed" date is the date a human re-read the piece against current sources.
- We don't accept article submissions in exchange for product placements, gift cards, or any other consideration.
Editorial team contact
Press enquiries, correction requests, source disputes, vet/trainer review-panel applications: editorial@squffy.com. We respond within five working days. Postal: Venderson B.V., Voltaweg 14, 5466 AZ Veghel, the Netherlands.
Ownership and registration
Squffy is operated by Venderson B.V., a Dutch private limited company registered with the Kamer van Koophandel (KvK). Registered address: Voltaweg 14, 5466 AZ Veghel, the Netherlands. Founders and current directors: Jenna and Dana. We have no outside investors, parent companies, or retail partnerships that influence editorial. The Squffy editorial team operates within the company but reports against this published policy, not against commercial targets.



